Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tom Gentzsch vs Emilien Demanet Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gentzsch vs Demanet analysis and find out who is favored!
Tom Gentzsch vs Emilien Demanet Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gentzsch 0 - 1 Demanet
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gentzsch has won 49.15% of points on his second serve, while Demanet has won 51.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gentzsch, in recent form, has won 53.2% of his opponent's second serve points, while Demanet has won 56.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.6% and 36.51% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gentzsch has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Demanet has saved 47.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gentzsch has won 60.87% of matches played (W/L 56/ 36), with Demanet winning 58.06% (W/L 18/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gentzsch has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 60/ 47), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 10/ 14). Demanet has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 6/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Gentzsch has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.65% of matches (W/L 52/ 31), where as Demanet has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.06% of matches (W/L 18/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gentzsch winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gentzsch winning 0 and Demanet winning 2. The last match between Gentzsch and Demanet was at the M15 Kursumlijska Banja, 04-05-2024, Semifinals, Clay with Emilien Demanet getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gentzsch and Demanet have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gentzsch winning 0 times and Demanet 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gentzsch winning 0, and Demanet 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gentzsch has played against opponents with an average rank of 152.64 while Demanet has played against players with an average rank of 119.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gentzsch has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Demanet has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gentzsch has converted 45.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Demanet has converted 46.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gentzsch 0 - 1 Demanet
540
Rank
540
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
884
Rank
884
High
19
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
55% (109-90)
Career Total W/L
58% (18-13)
61% (19-12)
YTD W/L
54% (13-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tom Gentzsch | Emilien Demanet |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:8:0 | 1:8:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (30/44) | 80% (43/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 50% (15/30) | 67% (29/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 36% (5/14) | 55% (6/11) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 100% (5/5) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (19/54) | 55% (24/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Emilien Demanet
Player
Tom Gentzsch
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tom Gentzsch | Emilien Demanet |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (19/12) | 54% (13/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (41/28) | 54% (28/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (348/310) | 51% (253/247) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 55% (6/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 67% (6/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (9/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.53 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 170 | 29 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 100 | 34 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:6 | 1:37:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 143.39 | 154.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1352/2055) | 70% (1001/1432) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (958/1352) | 62% (622/1001) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (352/703) | 50% (215/431) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (88/198) | 44% (77/176) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (841/2111) | 43% (658/1519) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 66% (19/10) | 54% (13/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (19/31) | 52% (12/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (20/18) | 93% (14/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (20/2) | 7% (14/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 0% (10/0) |
Tom Gentzsch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Tom Gentzsch
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Luca Giacomini
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Leopold Zima
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Keegan Rice
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Tom Gentzsch
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Leyton Rivera
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Pietro Pampanin
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Liam Gavrielides
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Tom Gentzsch
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Antoine Ghibaudo
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Emilien Demanet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Emilien Demanet
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Tom Gentzsch
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Peter Buldorini
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Sander Jong
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
39 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Tadija Radovanovic
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikola Milojevic
Player
Emilien Demanet
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
29 of
41)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Peter Fajta
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Gorazd Srbljak
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksa Pisaric
Player
Emilien Demanet
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
75%
(
54 of
72)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
65
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryuki Matsuda
Player
Emilien Demanet
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gentzsch Vs Demanet Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
